What contact information can someone find in the Canada directory before reaching out for care?
1,628Directory records analyzed
100.0%Have a phone or website entry
0Have neither entry
What the records show
Scope: records in the delivered Rehab.ai directory snapshot. The unit is a directory record, not a unique organization, treatment slot, or patient. The records are not a complete national census.
Unit: directory record. Each percentage uses 1,628 records as its denominator.
Recorded information
Records
Share
Phone entry
1,623 / 1,628
99.7%
Website entry
1,308 / 1,628
80.3%
At least one of these
1,628 / 1,628
100.0%
Both entries
1,303 / 1,628
80.0%
Neither entry
0 / 1,628
0.0%
These are structured catalog fields, not a complete audit of every rendered page or independently tested contact routes. A phone entry may be a switchboard or intake service. A website may belong to an organization rather than the individual location. Missing fields mean not recorded in this catalog, not that the provider cannot be contacted. Information may be present elsewhere on a listing, linked source, or provider page.
Local detail
602 distinct city/region labels appear in the analyzed records. Labels reflect the dataset and are not an official count of municipalities. The complete local breakdown is included in the download.
First 12 labels alphabetically; counts measure recorded information.
Location label
Records
Phone or website
100 Mile House, British Columbia
1
1 / 1
Abbotsford, British Columbia
9
9 / 9
Acton Vale, Quebec
1
1 / 1
Acton, Ontario
2
2 / 2
Agassiz, British Columbia
1
1 / 1
Ailsa Craig, Ontario
1
1 / 1
Airdrie, Alberta
1
1 / 1
Ajax, Ontario
2
2 / 2
Alban, Ontario
1
1 / 1
Alberton, Prince Edward Island
1
1 / 1
Alliston, Ontario
2
2 / 2
Alma, Quebec
2
2 / 2
The local question
Does the information come from a current provider page or a historical archive, and has the service location changed?
Evidence that needs context
Historical archive evidence remains historical
The Canadian dataset includes listings imported from preserved web archives. Archived pages are not current provider verification. This pass checks available current source links separately and retains archive references as historical evidence. It does not reset the age of archived clinical or contact information.
This edition does not calculate language-service availability from names, nationality, page language, or missing fields. Ask separately about the language used for intake, treatment delivered by staff, and interpreter assistance. These are different arrangements.
Does this contact reach the location and service I need?
Which intake, eligibility, payment, or referral conditions apply?
Can intake and treatment take place in my preferred language? If an interpreter is used, which stages are covered?
When were these details last confirmed with the service?
Sources and scope
The contact counts are an original analysis of Rehab.ai’s saved data. The references below identify recorded source material; listing a source here does not certify that all its details remain current or that every page was retrieved in this analysis.
Analysis edition: 2026-09-19. Input: delivered directory snapshot used for this build. Record source dates remain separate from this analysis date. A successful source-page request is not provider confirmation.
Each record contributes once to each applicable field count. A phone field counts when it contains digits; a website field counts when it contains an HTTP or HTTPS URL. Source-reference URLs are not silently converted into provider website fields. Neither method tests ownership, reachability, service suitability, or appointment availability.
Records can represent separate programs at one address or several locations of one organization. These counts must not be used to rank national care quality, infer population coverage, or compare clinical outcomes.
Rehab.ai operates the directory analyzed here. This report is a descriptive data audit, not a clinical assessment or a peer-reviewed study. Submit a correction with supporting evidence.